Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

More Impressive Is The 

52%
78 deviants said Regular Shot :thumb162495639:
48%
72 deviants said Infrared Photo Infrared Thunder by IngoSchobert

Devious Comments

:iconfractalwise:
Fractalwise Featured By Owner May 28, 2010   Digital Artist
I prefer the infrared photo, because the sky in the upper-left above the cloud bank is much darker than in the regular one, thus making the image more ominous. Also, the additional darkness sets up a better contrast with the clouds:)
Reply
:iconingoschobert:
IngoSchobert Featured By Owner May 29, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
Good reasons, for sure!

Thank you,

Ingo
Reply
:iconjon-rista:
jon-rista Featured By Owner May 28, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
Ditto. :)
Reply
:iconilovelucia:
ILoVeLuCia Featured By Owner May 28, 2010
I like more the OR photo!!
It's more impresive!I mean,the colors after IR are cool!:D
Reply
:iconingoschobert:
IngoSchobert Featured By Owner May 28, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
They have been taken with two cameras, one for IR the other my "normal" camera.

Thanks,

Ingo
Reply
:iconilovelucia:
ILoVeLuCia Featured By Owner May 28, 2010
:ohmygod:
I thought it was editated!
Reply
:iconingoschobert:
IngoSchobert Featured By Owner May 28, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
=D
Reply
:icondave-ellis:
Dave-Ellis Featured By Owner May 27, 2010
I prefer the regular shot on this occasion - the natural colours work well and the composition is more pleasing (also the fact that its cropped to nearer the golden mean makes it easier on the eye) :thumbsup:
Reply
:iconingoschobert:
IngoSchobert Featured By Owner May 27, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
Interesting - thanks Dave :nod:.
Last time I checked opinions seemed to be split down the middle, but in that case I would have assumed you on the other side of the fence. I will have to review that ;)

Btw, neither nor shot are cropped. I try as often as possible to capture the content I want to show without post cropping. Even when I present a square I usually take either the full height or full width of the shot as the base side length, depending on the shooting format.

Ingo
Reply
:icondave-ellis:
Dave-Ellis Featured By Owner May 27, 2010
:shocked: What D.Dave = no I.R? :omg:.. you've got to keep people on thier toes mate ;)

Ah of course, I understand now about the different ratio's/frame on the images sizes - u used a converted sony for the IR?

And unless you have expectations of selling HUGE prints never be afraid to crop ;) Take a guess at what % of the original image this is? [link]
Reply
Add a Comment:
 

Poll History